It would be “inhuman” for players like Watford forward Troy Deeney to face disciplinary action for declining to return to action in the midst of the pandemic to protect their families, according to the president of the World Union of Players.
FIFPRO general secretary Jonas Baer-Hoffmann says:
“Troy Deeney has been in the news – the idea that a player who has very legitimate concerns and wants to protect his family,” he said.
“If players are being pressured or being brought into the context of disciplinary action for that, we feel it is very much unacceptable.
“The idea that someone may be potentially punished in such a pandemic for trying to protect a family member’s health is inhumane and not acceptable to us.”
Hornet’s skipper Deeney said he would not return, citing worries about his five-month-old son having trouble breathing, and the National Statistics Office’s data showing that black people and those of other ethnic minorities suffer overwhelmingly from Covid-19 compared to white British citizens.
Deeney’s concerns are legitimate, according to Baer-Hoffmann:
“In its prospect for me it’s a very absurd idea, how a player may be asked to indemnify the club from the consequences of a protocol on such a disease which nobody knows the consequence of.
“Nobody knows whether these protocols will be applied correctly in the club environment – people may be making mistakes.
“To put that burden on the athlete is grossly inappropriate. I find it questionable whether these waivers would have any legal base ultimately if they were tested, but we would certainly discourage players from signing anything like that.”
There is suggestion that Watford would seek to take action against Deeney. The forward himself said on the Talk the Talk YouTube show earlier this week: “We’re due back in this week. I’ve said I’m not going.
“Within the meeting (with the Premier League concerning return-to-training protocols) I asked very simple questions.
“For Black, Asian and mixed ethnicities they are four times more likely to get the illness and twice as likely to have long-lasting illness – is there any additional screening? Heart stuff to see if anyone has a problem?
“I feel that should be addressed. I can’t get a haircut until mid-July but I can go and get in a box with 19 people and jump for a header? I don’t know how that works. No one could answer the questions – not because they didn’t want to, because they didn’t have the information.
“I just said ‘If you don’t know the information, why would I put myself at risk?’.
“It only takes one person to get infected. I don’t want to bring that home – my son is five months old and he’s had breathing difficulties.
“I don’t want to come home and put him in more danger.”
Baer-Hoffmann warned players around the world not to sign waivers before going back to work, describing them as “grossly unethical” and potentially technically unenforceable.
He said in North Macedonia the national players’ union was funding the cost of one round of testing themselves before players return to training.
He also said that in seven countries – Colombia, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, Botswana and Egypt – member unions were having to deliver food packages to players in order for them to survive.